BZE Research Diagnostic
Biozygotic Framework™ · Extended Assessment Tool
← Return to BZE Calculator

This extended diagnostic is designed for researchers, clinicians, and advanced users seeking a more granular psychosomatic profile. It maps clinical assessment items — organised by ECPP domain structure — onto BZE parameter outputs. It is an educational and research tool; not a clinical diagnostic instrument. All calculations run locally in your browser.

Theoretical Model — Pre-Validation ECPP Domain Alignment Unlisted Page — Not Indexed
Research context: The BZE is a theoretical framework currently seeking empirical validation. The ECPP domain structure used here reflects clinical assessment categories developed by Kirillov et al. The mapping between ECPP domains and BZE parameters represents a theoretical hypothesis, not a validated correlation. If you are a researcher interested in contributing to a formal validation study, see the Research page.
Domain 1 · ECPP Section 1
Psychosomatic Syndromes & Complaints
BZE mapping → D(t) allostatic damage · O(t) somatic expression

These items capture the active somatic expression of accumulated allostatic damage. In BZE terms, high scores here represent the downstream biological output of a D(t) value that has exceeded the organism's repair capacity — the point where mathematical wear becomes clinical symptom. Rate each subscale 0–3 using ECPP criteria.

1.1 Conversion Symptoms → D(t) + α_periph ↓

Neurological symptoms without organic basis — motor, sensory, seizure-type. Requires: ≥4 symptom criteria, absence of organic pathology, ≥2 of 4 associated characteristics (la belle indifférence, histrionic features, stress precipitation, symptom modelling).

ECPP Score:
1.2 Associated Symptoms → D(t) active damage

Symptoms resembling physical illness experienced or observed in others. Accompanied by significant changes in: physical/emotional reactions, productivity, relationships, or worldview. Distress present. No organic pathology.

ECPP Score:
1.3 Allostatic Overload Symptoms → D(t) + E_budget ↓

Sleep disruption, generalised anxiety, irritability, sadness, demoralization, lack of energy, dizziness. Significant functional impairment. Associated with identifiable stressor within 6 months exceeding individual coping capacity.

ECPP Score:
1.4 Bodily Distress Disorder → D(t) + α_cent ↓

≥6 functional symptoms from ≥2 organ systems (cardiovascular, respiratory, GI, urogenital, skin, pain) persisting ≥3 months. Accompanied by autonomic arousal (palpitations, tremor, flushing, sweating) or exaggerated medication side effects indicating low pain threshold.

ECPP Score:
Domain 2 · ECPP Section 2
Structural Risk Factors — Personality Structure
BZE mapping → α_central · Cognitive Style calibration · Autonomic Default

Personality-level structural features that systematically modulate psychosomatic vulnerability. In the BZE these correspond most closely to α_central — the central coupling capacity that determines how effectively psychological resources are deployed. Alexithymia directly reduces narrative coherence (r_ψ) and somatic connection; Type A behaviour maps onto sympathetic autonomic default; key conflict suppresses B(t) agency.

2.1 Alexithymia → α_cent ↓ · r_ψ ↓ · embodiment ↓

≥3 of 6 criteria: inability to describe emotions; describes circumstances rather than feelings; lacks fantasy life; thought content externally focused; unaware of somatic correlates of emotion; occasional violent affective outbursts.

ECPP Score:
2.2 Type A Behaviour → Sympathetic Default · D(t) ↑ · HRV ↓

≥5 of 9: excessive work engagement; pervasive time urgency; motor-expressive features under time pressure; hostility/cynicism; irritability; accelerated physical and mental activity; high achievement drive; high competitiveness.

ECPP Score:
2.3 Key Conflict (Courtesy Predominance) → B(t) ↓ · I_DA suppressed

Patient habitually restrains reactions to secure relationship — even to the detriment of their own interests and comfort. Maps onto the BZE's agency suppression mechanism: relational safety is present but purchased at the cost of telic drive.

ECPP Score:
2.4 Misinterpretation of Bodily Senses → α_cent ↓ · embodiment distorted

Includes hypochondriasis (misinterpretation of symptoms as serious disease ≥6 months), disease phobia (specific disease fear, attack-form), thanatophobia (groundless fear of imminent death), or health anxiety (<6 months, readily reassured).

ECPP Score:
Domain 3 · ECPP Section 3
Triggers — Environmental & Internal Stressors
BZE mapping → σ·ξ contextual amplification · ξ stochastic noise · inner ξ

The BZE's ξ term captures external environmental unpredictability. ECPP triggers reveal that ξ also has an internal dimension — biographical triggers, inner conflicts, and hidden messages are prediction-error generators arising from within the organism's own narrative structure. This domain distinguishes external σ·ξ from internal ξ amplification.

3.1 Stress Overload → σ·ξ ↑ · D(t) ↑

Macrotraumas: high concentration of significant life events (LCU >300 for 6 months or >500 for 1 year). Microtraumas: recurring reactions to discrepancy between expected and actual reality, generating ongoing tension affecting mood, physical condition, relationships, and performance.

ECPP Score:
3.2 Anniversary / Trigger Reactions → internal ξ · biographical D(t)

Emotionally charged triggers, age-related reactions, or anniversaries of loss triggering autonomic arousal, functional syndromes, or conversion symptoms. Patient unaware of the association. Represents biographical temporal encoding activating present somatic response.

ECPP Score:
3.3 Hidden Message → B(t) distortion · narrative fragmentation

Ongoing suppression of emotionally charged impulses in relationships. The symptom allows discharge of the impulse or conveys a message — consciously or not. In BZE terms: agency (B) is redirected through somatic expression rather than direct action.

ECPP Score:
3.4 Inner Conflict → dissipation ↑ · α_cent ↓

Excessive emotional/behavioural reaction with a conscious trigger ("every time I am expected to obey..."). Patient cannot identify underlying need without external help. Represents a high-dissipation state where narrative coherence has not yet metabolised the biographical conflict.

ECPP Score:
Domain 4 · ECPP Section 4
Secondary Risk Factors
BZE mapping → B(t) collapse · narrative coherence ↓ · agency loop disruption

Secondary risk factors represent the ways in which initial psychosomatic dysfunction becomes self-perpetuating — disrupting the agency and narrative coherence mechanisms that would otherwise enable recovery. Demoralization in particular is almost definitionally equivalent to BZE agency collapse: the perception that no solution exists for current problems, with preserved reactive capacity but absent forward drive.

4.1 Fixation on Somatic Symptoms → dissipation ↑ · B(t) misdirected

≥2 of 4: excessive focus on physical suffering; desperate symptom control; helpless fear of new symptoms; demands for clear diagnosis and physical treatment. Available agency is consumed by symptom monitoring rather than productive forward action.

ECPP Score:
4.2 Illness Denial → narrative fragmentation · D(t) accumulation unimpeded

Persistent denial of physical disorder and/or treatment need despite established diagnosis and adequate medical information. Represents a narrative coherence failure — the biographical integration mechanism rejecting information that threatens the self-model.

ECPP Score:
4.3 Demoralization → I_DA → 0 · B(t) collapse · hopelessness

Helplessness (perceives self as unable to cope; lacks support; reactive capacity preserved) + duration ≥1 month + generalization. Hopelessness (C criterion): consciousness of having failed, conviction that no solutions exist. This is the clinical expression of what the BZE models as agency collapse — the multiplicative gate has closed.

ECPP Score:
Domain 5 · BZE Extension — Weathering Audit
Structural Weathering — Granular σ Assessment
BZE mapping → σ (noise amplification) · sex_friction · age_dmg_multiplier

The main calculator captures weathering as a single composite slider. This domain disaggregates σ into its constituent structural sources — following Geronimus (1992, 2023) and the allostatic load literature. Each category represents a distinct biological cost mechanism. Rate each 0–3: 0 = not applicable, 1 = mild/occasional, 2 = moderate/regular, 3 = severe/pervasive.

Economic & Material Deprivation→ σ_economic

Housing instability, food insecurity, inadequate healthcare access, significant financial debt generating chronic background anxiety.

Economic Weathering0
NoneSevere
Discrimination & Identity-Based Friction→ σ_identity

Regular code-switching, experienced racism, discrimination, or systemic barriers due to race, gender, sexuality, disability, religion, or cultural identity.

Identity-Based Weathering0
NoneSevere
Environmental & Physical Exposure→ σ_environment

Chronic exposure to noise, pollution, unsafe neighbourhood, long commute, or physically hazardous conditions that drain energy before the day begins.

Environmental Weathering0
NoneSevere
Caregiving & Role Burden→ σ_role

Primary caregiving without adequate respite, toxic or exploitative work environment, or role demands that systematically prevent recovery.

Role Burden Weathering0
NoneSevere
Chronic Threat Vigilance→ σ_vigilance · Autonomic Default modifier

Constant "on guard" state when moving through community. Persistent hypervigilance as a survival adaptation — the biological cost of sustained threat appraisal even in objective safety.

Chronic Vigilance Load0
NoneSevere
Domain 6 · BZE Extension — Agency Scaffold
Behavioural Agency — Granular B(t) Assessment
BZE mapping → B(t) · I_DA · Resources multiplier · E_budget funding

The main calculator captures agency through purpose and relational safety. This domain disaggregates B(t) into its constituent inputs — including somatic regulation practices (which directly affect α_periph and thus the B(t) multiplicative gate), contemplative practices (narrative coherence and embodiment), and social resources. Rate each 0–3: 0 = not present, 1 = emerging/occasional, 2 = established/regular, 3 = strong/daily practice.

Somatic Regulation Practices→ α_periph ↑ · HRV ↑

Yoga, somatic experiencing, body scan, breathwork, Stress Surfing, biofeedback, or other practices that directly train vagal tone and interoceptive accuracy.

Somatic Practice Regularity0
NoneDaily established
Mindfulness & Contemplative Practice→ α_cent ↑ · dissipation ↓

Mindfulness meditation, contemplative prayer, reflective journalling, or structured awareness practices that reduce cognitive dissipation and strengthen narrative coherence.

Contemplative Practice Regularity0
NoneDaily established
Psychotherapy or Structured Self-Work→ r_ψ ↑ · ACEs repair · surplus_repair

Active engagement in psychotherapy (psychodynamic, CBT, EMDR, somatic, PPT, or other), coaching, or structured biographical integration work. Directly increases the attachment repair term and narrative coherence.

Therapeutic Engagement0
NoneActive & regular
Social Capital & Community Resources→ Resources multiplier ↑

Active participation in faith community, peer support groups, professional networks, or cultural community. Measures the social scaffolding dimension of the Resources multiplier beyond individual attachment security.

Community Resource Access0
NoneRich & active
Telic Direction & Vocational Clarity→ I_DA ↑ · B(t) gate opens

Clarity of forward direction — whether grounded in personal goals, professional vocation, faith, or service. Includes vocational and spiritual sources of meaning as legitimate I_DA inputs per Frankl, Ryff, and Keyes.

Telic Clarity & Purpose0
Absent / driftingStrong & clear
Research Diagnostic Summary
ECPP Domain Scores
Domain 1 — Syndromes
0
/ 12  · 
→ D(t) indicator
Domain 2 — Risk Factors
0
/ 12  · 
→ α_cent indicator
Domain 3 — Triggers
0
/ 12  · 
→ σ·ξ indicator
Domain 4 — Secondary
0
/ 9  · 
→ B(t) indicator
Overall ECPP Classification
Not significant Significant Extremely significant
Complete all domain ratings above to generate classification.
BZE Extended Parameters
Weathering σ (granular)
0
/ 15 composite
σ estimate
Agency B(t) scaffold
0
/ 15 composite
B scaffold estimate
Theoretical ECPP → BZE Parameter Mapping
ECPP Domain BZE Parameter Hypothesised Direction Mechanism
D1 — Psychosomatic SyndromesD(t)D1↑ → D(t)↑Somatic expression of accumulated allostatic load
D2 — Structural Risk Factorsα_centD2↑ → α_cent↓Alexithymia reduces narrative coherence and embodiment; Type A maps sympathetic default
D3 — Triggersσ·ξD3↑ → ξ↑External + internal stochastic noise amplification
D4 — Secondary Risk FactorsB(t)D4↑ → B(t)↓Demoralization = agency collapse; fixation = agency misdirection
D5 — Weathering (granular)σD5↑ → σ↑Structural violence operationalized across 5 subcategories
D6 — Agency ScaffoldB(t) inputsD6↑ → B(t)↑Somatic, contemplative, therapeutic, social, and telic resources
For researchers: These correlations represent theoretical hypotheses derived from the BZE's parameter architecture and the ECPP's clinical framework. A formal pilot validation study (N=30–40, cross-sectional, Spearman rank correlations with Bonferroni correction) is proposed on the Research page. If you are interested in contributing to this study as a clinical site, co-investigator, or data analyst, please contact Dr. Cope.